Educational (not) Rant
A rant on anyone of our education unit readings...I'll keep this short seeing as it is a Friday night, and the fact that I can not readily absorb many of these documents.
John Holt and his essay "School Is Bad For Children" is the direct counter essay to "In Defense of Elitism." Holt begins by saying that all children goes into school more willing to learn and smarter than they will ever be in their school life, as well as the real life. I'm not sure where to stand on this issue. Holt also claims that the things we learn are school are not really necessary for our future, and that there are more ways of learning the required skills, as school is just a supplementary. I would have to say I agree, because really, do I really need to learn about colonial America or Pascal's triangle in order to go on with life? Most of it is irrelevant and is keeping me from learning what I really need to learn, like social interaction and etiquette. Holt states his view on school as "you come to school to learn" and that leads to "as if the children were incapable of learning on their own." This may be a false accusation, as I see schools saying "you come to learn more and build upon the knowledge you already know." Holt also argues that students become a blank document, for the teacher to write and teach as they please. What the students learn is judged and determined by the teacher. And we only allow that to happen because we are bribed into doing so by grades. And he proposes the only way to cure this problem is to allow students to teach themselves, each other, and go out of school to learn the things they would need in the future. To me, Holt seems to look at teachers differently. He is saying teachers are like dictators, feeding us with information they want us to know, and I see teachers as guides to the educational process. Though his proposals for change are a bit extreme, I would actually consider the abolishment of the attendance system, to determine which students are actually willing to learn (and saves money in this case); and allow field trips outside of school to allow students to expand their intellectual capabilities.
Blah, as Connie Tang has already stated, this is starting to sound like crap. I just woke up from a 2 hour nap and I am very disoriented. I should avoid naps, but my body shuts down at a certain time. Until next time, lets hope I will do a freewrite. I have cereal in mind, but that will probably lead into something new.
John Holt and his essay "School Is Bad For Children" is the direct counter essay to "In Defense of Elitism." Holt begins by saying that all children goes into school more willing to learn and smarter than they will ever be in their school life, as well as the real life. I'm not sure where to stand on this issue. Holt also claims that the things we learn are school are not really necessary for our future, and that there are more ways of learning the required skills, as school is just a supplementary. I would have to say I agree, because really, do I really need to learn about colonial America or Pascal's triangle in order to go on with life? Most of it is irrelevant and is keeping me from learning what I really need to learn, like social interaction and etiquette. Holt states his view on school as "you come to school to learn" and that leads to "as if the children were incapable of learning on their own." This may be a false accusation, as I see schools saying "you come to learn more and build upon the knowledge you already know." Holt also argues that students become a blank document, for the teacher to write and teach as they please. What the students learn is judged and determined by the teacher. And we only allow that to happen because we are bribed into doing so by grades. And he proposes the only way to cure this problem is to allow students to teach themselves, each other, and go out of school to learn the things they would need in the future. To me, Holt seems to look at teachers differently. He is saying teachers are like dictators, feeding us with information they want us to know, and I see teachers as guides to the educational process. Though his proposals for change are a bit extreme, I would actually consider the abolishment of the attendance system, to determine which students are actually willing to learn (and saves money in this case); and allow field trips outside of school to allow students to expand their intellectual capabilities.
Blah, as Connie Tang has already stated, this is starting to sound like crap. I just woke up from a 2 hour nap and I am very disoriented. I should avoid naps, but my body shuts down at a certain time. Until next time, lets hope I will do a freewrite. I have cereal in mind, but that will probably lead into something new.